Trapper wrote:he wasn't responding to comments by Alex Salmond but by stewart maxwell the sports minister.
You are of course right Trapper – it was Stewart Maxwell ... but I did not hear Salmond rushing to contradict him
. Much more importantly, I did not hear any athletes rushing out to back this proposal.
I did laugh though about using Jamaica as an example of a small country ... what happened to the other ‘small’ nations usually cited ... Denmark, Iceland, Norway? ‘ Oh – they didn’t do so well, so let’s gloss over that...’ not so clever, Mr Maxwell. And the Jamaicans themselves are first to recognise that their medals came
only in short-distance, track events. There is a lot of debate about why that might be the case – but let’s not get into that here. Suffice to say it is unlikely that the Jamaican experience will be replicated in Scotland.
Seriously,
I would be the first to back the idea of a separate Scotland team for the Olympics if I thought for a second that it would be good for Scottish sport and for our athletes. But I think that the current set-up is superior, and is very attractive to sportsmen and women, helping them fulfil their potential. And it would not simply be a matter of reproducing the investment in facilities – it involves employing – and funding - great coaches, physicians, psychologists, technologists, etc – the whole back-up team that they all enthuse over.
Hume is spot on in reminding everyone that these are
UK facilities – and these can and should be located in any part of the UK, available to all UK athletes.
Your quote by Hoy, to my reading, endorses the view that there is no problem competing as a Scottish athlete at one competition, and as a GB one at a different tournament. It really is – I think – the best of both worlds.