Yes, you definitely asked for it Roger! I wasn't getting at you btw, just the folk I know who seem to have double standards.
Although your comment about arrogant ba***rd made me growl!
Govangirl wrote:bill wrote: 1. Buckingham Palace had insisted the Queen would not be offended if players chose not to acknowledge her."
2. Once again certain people are only too keen to jump on the anti royalist bandwagon and make trouble where there is none.
1. Oh I'd be quite happy to acknowledge her. She can pop in anytime for a cup of tea and bit of shortbread. I just won't be bowing.
2. Correct. As Gizmo said earlier, his comments were taken totally out of context.
and although there isn't a 3 I'm going to make one:
3. Folk down here all seem to hate Murray, based, I believe, on what are perceived as his anti-English views - the same people btw that jump up and down at me not supporting the England football team - and attack him on two counts: 1, the fact he's not 'nice' and2, the fact he is Scottish. The latter disturbs me but the fact he is not seen as a Henman Mr Nice Guy is worse. I'd much rather have a recalcitrant WINNER than a well-mannered and 'nice' loser. No-one remembers a runner-up.
I'm sick to the back teeth of being whined at: "We'd support you lot if Scotland were in the World Cup and we weren't" because it's total cr*p! I remember 1978!
Govangirl wrote:I'm not as scary as you think I am, I'm really not! Mr Govangirl thinks I have you all duped. Anyway, turn around and answer the question boy, why do you think Murray is fatherless and arrogant?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests