by Isa » Sat Jan 28, 2012 12:52 pm
This is taken from the "Campbeltown Book" published by the Kintyre Civic Society 2003
The Campbeltown Book
............ Though the Board grew more flexible and the Burgh more adept at deal further Housing Acts practically tripped over each other throughout the 70s and '30s in to address, each with different terms and conditions, different specific aspects of the genera so the Council were frequently debating the relative merits (i.e., the economic pros an say, classifying a scheme as slum clearance (which entailed demolition) or as overcrow (which didn't). Sometimes they confused the two, later they managed to combine them scheme, and, later still, they were classifying four schemes under four separate Acts. Anc soon at issue was, in today's parlance, the question of 'greenfield' versus 'brownfield' sit first this simply meant weighing the costs of infrastructure against those of demolil notwithstanding Kintyre Agricultural Society's objection to losing "the only suitable and o field""1 for the Cattle Show, it failed to deflect the completion of Castleacres because the C( retained a feu option on the rest of the housing land in mind.
However, by the time the Board of Health re-invited housing scheme applications in 19i a 1924 Act, H. E. Clifford had retired, so the Corporation muddled through Phases II and and 20 dwellings respectively, using standard-type blocks of four on layouts prepared by ti Surveyor - all modified (cheapened) as necessary to gain the Board's approval. For the fo final phase, of 32 flats again in two-storey blocks of four, the Corporation appointed James! & Sons of Airdrie as "Architects and Measurers""1 - which perhaps explains how it secured proportion of 2-apartment homes for small families than was officially allowed. The last of tt estate's 96 new homes were completed in 1931, its through road having been named Smi in 1927 "as a compliment to Provost [John] Smith who [in the capacity of Housing 0 throughout] had taken such a large and active interest in the Housing Scheme of the Cour
Three considerations then prompted an outright switch to 'brownfield' sites. First and foi the Lochend/Dalaruan/Dalintober area was by now clogged with an agglomeration of red distillery buildings, semi- if not wholly derelict: in 1926 the Corporation had already been Kintyre Distillery site for £100, and two years later Duncan McCallum, "naturally anxious development and amenity of the town", gifted Kinloch Distillery to it, complete with reusablf "of excellent quality,""1 yet entirely free. Secondly, the Council reckoned that tenements in bl< 12 would be more economical to build than 'flatted houses' in blocks of four; and this was imp not only to keep the rates down but also because, now that local authorities could not cor 'unfit' housing without providing for its occupants, such people could hardly be rehoused at they couldn't afford. But thirdly, by 1931, there resurfaced a sense, largely lost during thei distilleries, of the loch-head-type shape most appropriate for Campbeltown's good: instead housing scheme which would be an excrescence on the old town", the Council now "wanted t the town reconstructed around the shores of the loch, which was its natural base."cThis, in Id should lead out of depression into prosperity by attracting new residents as well as more via clearance and redevelopment must therefore be the order of the day, to make Campbeltown wi of its "wonderful site and situation."
In practice, of course, things didn't pan out quite like that. Although Kinloch Distillery wa obvious place to start, councillors were tempted to look their gift horse in the mouth when demol proved ineligible for unemployment relief grant, when redevelopment had to be fitted around "tumble-down shacks"0 in Longrow whose tenants lacked interim accommodation, when the reus stone had to be used on an unbudgeted-for plinth to raise the new tenement blocks above fl level, when McCallum Street had to be constructed as an unsubsidized charge on the rates, w the national economic crisis put tradesmen's prices in jeopardy, and when building delays therel cost the Corporation almost a year's receipt of rent. Nevertheless, two of the first three blocks w "practically finished"c by the summer of 1933, with the work proceeding straight into its sea phase of another three blocks and James Thomson's ground-breaking distillery scheme thus creat 53 new homes by the end of 1935. Though not a square, the complex was called Park Square simplify its numbering, and the final block was grafted in later, after clearance of the interveni Longrow properties.