Beachcomber wrote:John S wrote:your alternative is?
Better and more efficient use of the money already available to them, coupled with transparent accountability that any reasonably intelligent person can understand?
I'd like to see the councils demonstrate that they're making efficient and worthwhile use of the money that they already take from us, before telling us they need more.
What you say Beachcomber is fair, accountability and efficiency in local government in the past has been equated with building bigger administrative structures and geographical areas in order to achieve economies of scale and using top heavy management structures to achieve accountability. Unfortunately the bureaucracy which accompanying giantisim only serves to stifle savings in red tape, the size of the administrative areas means accountability with the natural geographic community is lost - particularly in rural areas; what has the administrative area Mid Argyll, Kintyre Islay & Jura got in common?
The proposal announced at the top of this thread could change the shape of local services to make them more directly accountable to the real communities they serve. People in South Kintyre could have much of the decision-making taken here rather than in Kilmory. The local councillors would also be held more accountable in decision making process and would be more available to and expected to consult more with the community than is currently the case.
This is a radical proposal and will require a considerable amount of consultation and time to impliment successfully but their is no reason why smaller community units joined on an equal basis where necessessary could not achieve economies of scale and deliver efficient and accountable services in their communities







