smiles wrote:Bonnie Lass wrote:Front page of Courier this week. Quote from the article "This is a presitgious building and I am confident that there will be a demand for this excellent resource"
Who will be putting Public Indemnity Insurance in place, is it the "hirers responsibility" ??
Not sure the relevance of the question at this point as a viable use is still to be found and isn't it just highlighting more red tape for the Council to throw about? I imagine it is hard enough to organise anything nowadays without adding this?
Seems quite a valid point to me ! What if someone gets injured or killed in the building, through no fault of there own !
Not to be overlooked nowadays, with so many people claiming for this and that, with the slightest problem...
maxmix