The Kintyre Forum

Coroner Lord Justice Baker

The inquest also heard that members of MI6 were in Paris during the summer that Diana and Dodi Al Fayed both died. But Lord Justice Baker said " they had bigger fish to fry than tracking Diana ".

1. Why has Justice Baker failed to mention Dodi ?
2. Bigger fish to fry - I can only assume that he uses the term fry - as a analogy for murder.
As most fried fish are dead - long before they hit the pan.
In all honesty - do we really imagine that the Royal Family will be found guilty - and they actively used members of homeland security - to conspire to kill their hated Daughter in law.
On the surface this may seem far fetched - particularly amongst Monarchists.
Nevertheless evidence points to the dreadful in laws.
Who were the big fish then - in normal circumstances this information would be deemed top secret - However ten years down the line - Did they catch the big fish ? - did they fry the fish ?- What type of fish did they catch that summer? - What was the names of the fish - the Nationality of the fish.
If you ask me there is something fishy about the whole incident - and this recent enquiry.
If justice be done - then no one must be above the law - be it Queen or Commoner.

Im am so surprised by your concern as I have heard your opinion, on numerous occasions, about Diana. Is this a softer side to the wee rebel or was there just no one online to argue with at that time of morning?
Back to the subject matter. I feel, and always have felt, that something evil happened that night in Paris. Too many unanswered questions. The journalist who was found shot dead several months later, who happened to own a white car as seen by many witnesses prior to the impact. The drivers clandestine meetings with government agencies etc etc...............No mention of fish though!
Was it the Codfather ?

What a load of CARP.

Ionns,get off your PERCH and SKATE off to some PLAICE with your red HERRING of a theory.

And stop playing with your COCKLES and WINKLE

bill - OK - Winkie

Mmm, is there something going on between you two??

Bit of coddling by the sound of it!!!!!!!!

ionnsaigh wrote:bill - OK - Winkie

Now that IS a blast from the past

bill, what is?

My childhood nickname

Och thats nice. But Diana was murdered.......Right!

W R O N G !

I was herring that she was ????

Friend of Dorothy wrote:Im am so surprised by your concern as I have heard your opinion, on numerous occasions, about Diana. Is this a softer side to the wee rebel or was there just no one online to argue with at that time of morning?
Back to the subject matter. I feel, and always have felt, that something evil happened that night in Paris. Too many unanswered questions. The journalist who was found shot dead several months later, who happened to own a white car as seen by many witnesses prior to the impact. The drivers clandestine meetings with government agencies etc etc...............No mention of fish though!
Was it the Codfather ?

Dear friend,
My concern lies not with the dear departed - rather that justice alone - should stand above all - regardless of rank privilege or status.
Of course to deny my Scottish Republican sentiments - would lead to unrepairable damage - as to the creditability and validity of my account .
Royal Families come and go- every dog has it's day - Monarchies are in essence - anti democratic - ruthless by - products of unbridled savagery - imposed on a kneeling head bowed people - who are actively encouraged to worship at the feet - of the great and the good.
Given the choice of - forever worshipping at the feet of despots - as subservient subjects - or - A citizen in a democratically elected government - for and by the people - without that age old hangover of monarchy - then I stand for republicanism. Loyalty and servility - are ingredients expected - by those who espouse
god given rule. Both experience blinkered reality - both blind the sufferer - zealots of the highest order.

Anyway I'm slightly biased in my outlook - this may cloud my judgement - however having an opinion should not exclude one - from forming judgement.

You state that Diana was murdered - I dismiss your feeling - that something evil happened that night. On two counts.
1. The concept of evil belongs in the realms of supernaturalism.
2. It acts purely on the individuals own subjective value based judgements - you know what might appear sweet to you - can equally appear bitter to me.

However leaving aside these secondary considerations - Your contention that Diana was murdered has - in the circumstances found - solid footing - as opposed to bill's post - WRONG -.
You bill - have considerably more substantiating - Why would the contention - that Diana was murdered on the orders of one or more of the royal family - be given such contemptuous treatment - by a single word reply.
No I'm afraid you have to better than that.
Who would be the prime suspect in such a heinous deed - if deed it be - The Queen - Prince Charles ?
Both had ample reasons - to privately celebrate - the disappearance of her royal highness - the Princess of Wales - bitter estranged wife of the heir apparent . Perhaps it was a modern day equivalent to - off with her head. She was someone who knew too much - Charles his physical attraction to male servants - Kneel open your mouth - in the name of your future King.
Our our current majesty Queen Elizabeth 11 - do you think she gave the nod - did she have reason to give the nod .
History has shown - time and time again - the violent legacy of these parasites - then is it completely irrational to suggest- that the legacy continues.

I don't know about the queen's daughter-in-law being murdered, but you certainly murder the queen's English.

Guilty - as charged sir - difficult hiding 18 months secondary education.