Child abuse unit paying for data
BBC News Online wrote:The unit set up to tackle child sex abuse in the UK has had to pay tens of thousand of pounds to internet firms for information. The Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP) has spent more than £170,000 since 2006.
Should ISP's charge a fee for searching and passing back information to the police when the crime in question often takes place on and in areas created by companies themselves?
BBC News Online wrote:The information can "very often, identify, locate and safeguard a child who is subject to abuse," according to Mr Gamble.
The law says that ISPs can charge for the service. Some do not. Others, though, demand as much as £65 a time.
Should all the ISP's not have an open door policy when dealing with child abuse, thus maybe stopping some offenders actually starting to "groom", for fear of being caught?
Does the attitude of some ISP's make it easier for sex pests to operate?
Forgot the link to the story
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7840924.stm