


mrsbagpuss wrote:(I've been holding back saying this as I’m sure this will rile most folk, but........)
I have to say I find it slightly Hypocritical that the community wanted and campaigned for a turbine factory at Machrihanish, but it seems it’s only acceptable to produce the things as long as they are not used in your eyeline........ I am a local, but have also lived elsewhere with these things on my doorstep and must say it neither put me up nor down, and I couldn’t hear any noise from them..... these were on shore, but the area was rural so the view was compromised but not the whole 360 degrees..... you find you dont notice them! And as Kintyre is full of lovely views I can't see that tourists will be seriously put off?
(Sorry to be contraversial, I'm not being argumentative so be kind to me!)



bill wrote:So let me get this right........
There is another thread ....
"SKYCON ORDER
Postby DRUMLEMEN1 » Wed Nov 25, 2009 12:59 pm
Good news-SKYCON win order for Europe's largest onshore windfarm http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/gla ... 378524.stm"
Which is ofcourse fantastic news,but when there is a plan afoot to situate a windfarm off the coast at Machrihanish,which it is possible Skycon could get the order for,it is not good news.
Sounds like a case of Not In My Back Yard to me.Great news for Skycon winning orders as long as they are not going to be situated to spoil your views.![]()
Can't really have it both ways.
mrsbagpuss wrote:(I've been holding back saying this as I’m sure this will rile most folk, but........)
I have to say I find it slightly Hypocritical that the community wanted and campaigned for a turbine factory at Machrihanish, but it seems it’s only acceptable to produce the things as long as they are not used in your eyeline........ I am a local, but have also lived elsewhere with these things on my doorstep and must say it neither put me up nor down, and I couldn’t hear any noise from them..... these were on shore, but the area was rural so the view was compromised but not the whole 360 degrees..... you find you dont notice them! And as Kintyre is full of lovely views I can't see that tourists will be seriously put off?
(Sorry to be contraversial, I'm not being argumentative so be kind to me!)


jowett63 wrote:
The other night I stood in my back garden and could see only stars and hear only the rumble of the surf. If we surrender, then in 4 years time I will see only a gaudy array of navigation lights and the disonant droning whoosh of the blades. Nature or industry? i thought windfarms were supposed to help preserve such wonders.


EMDEE wrote:because of its remote location, arguably has a fragile tourist economy, which could be compromised by such a development

Sheik Yir Erse wrote:It's the same arguement for a different age. I'm guessing if all the nimbys had their way over the years, Campbeltown would still consist of one single house![]()
Sheik Yir Erse wrote:I think tomorrow's children might be happier with a poorer view out of Machrihanish than continuing our unsustainable reliance on exisiting energy sources.

A15 NMA wrote:FYI
The "short term" areas which wizzie talks about above are "Round 3" projects (5 on the East coast & 5 on the West coast) Those areas all have an approved lease for development.Apparently the only thing which will deny these projects the go ahead is an extremely rare find of some unknown marine life



Return to Local News and Issues
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests