Thep,
daftdog wrote:The Old Gaol and Courthouse is an older building than the Burnet and its up keep has went well over the years it has been empty has it not??
Is that the way to go, because if it is left empty for too long, it will be sold and used for whatever..or end up like this..
thep wrote: There is a major difference in the comparison you have made to these buildings in Bolgam Street. These are privately owned buildings and therefore the Council has no responsibility (unless they become unsafe).
I didn't say the council owned the Old Gaol House, i was inferring that if left empty with no real purpose, the burnet building could go the same way, although i find it hard to believe it would get as bad, as it would be flats before that..
thep wrote:However, there is a civic duty for our Council to maintain two of our finest buildings whether these are occupied or not.
Yes, but what would you rather see happen, them maintaining an empty building or use it themselves? If they are not going to use it them selves, then at the very least it needs to be leased out on a full repairing and insurance lease, this way the council are making some money, not spending it. What use of the building would allow this though ?
thep wrote:However, I was under the impression that part of this move meant the Museum would expand and become a tourist attraction in its own right. There is certainly scope for the Heritage Centre to move there too as the Lorne Street Church building is crumbling!
I thought this to about the museum and putting the tourist info office in there, might get a few more paying customers to actually visit it (it would need a bit of an upgrade though, as it was mostly deed critters the last time i was in it)
And if they moved the Heritage Centre in there, just think how many flats would fit onto the Lorne Street site..!!!
thep wrote:What is the matter with the towns folk deciding? Or at least having a view or a say which has not been allowed to happen.
Where did i say the townsfolk shouldn't have a say?? I said
daftdog wrote:Thus if you do not agree and want to use it for something else, then get off ya bums and get it done yersel.. Find the use, find the funding, stop it becoming offices, give the council the options... if not, stop bleating about it.
It really doesn't affect me, no matter what happens to the buildings. When i next come to town it will be as a tourist
thep wrote:Wouldn't you agree that a one stop shop of council services is the most cost effective way forward? Look at the costs of this move? Christ I could build a series of homes with gold taps in them!

Well by selling the Dell road building, the council can cover the cost of the move and someone can build the very same "series of homes with gold taps in them! " lol.
At the end of the day, there are a lot of different ideas floating about and the council will not spend money looking at the different options, as they want the office space.. The people who see different opportunities need to do some leg work and get support from many others in the town and surrounding areas, after all tourists only account for some of the money being spent in the town..
The only thing the building should not be used for is a PUB...lol. id rather see it sold off and dismantled brick by brick and rebuilt in Germany or somewhere..