Public Meeting

Forum publicising and discussing local issues and news in general.

Postby dedalus » Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:10 am

Interesting Bobbie hope your daughter is ok - anyone interested in the Scottishness of America should read "The founding fathers" I forget the author - But the point is there are no "Scottish Americans" or english ones for that matter - in the way that there are Irish or african or Italian Americans - they are just "Americans" - Think of America as a relative who moved away and did well for themself.
dedalus
Happy Camper
Happy Camper
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 6:12 pm


Postby general jack o'niell » Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:43 am

:lol:
Last edited by general jack o'niell on Wed Oct 18, 2006 3:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
general jack o'niell
 


Postby Sweltered » Wed Sep 20, 2006 11:29 am

ionnsaigh wrote:
Sweltered wrote:I was talking about Moslem men in the UK, I made that clear. I was talking about getting off your ar$e here, I'm in the US, can't you understand anything!

Why do you always have to twist things, moron, my point wasn't as sinsister as you wish to believe it was, I was talking about ALL racial group in the US because Trapper was suggesting that only the African Americans were poor, (and I'll say it again), moron. I was reporting on a belief, printed in the Wall Street journal (shock horror a capitalist paper) suggesting the Islamification (is that a word?) of Europe. IT IS NOT MY VIEW. Moron. It must difficult to exist, when all you pay attention to is communist doctrine. Try reading and understanding what you read. My friends family were exactly as I expected, nice people. Oh and by the way, you can dislike someone without being racist.

Do communists qualify as a race?


No Communism is International as is the inherent drive in most Humans for fairness and justice -alas you revert to childlike name calling, when your shallow right wing views are confronted. As far as the Islamification of Europe is concerned -that is a view you happen to share with the Wall Street Journal,the difference only lies in timescale according to you, "It will take longer". How long until the Scottishification of the USA takes place? In your opinion I presume never. Why , something to do with presbyterian indoctrination that you where subjected to in your formative years- I guess.
Nobody in their right mind would willing want to move to the USA- Why- because it represents the greatest danger ever encountered by Mankind. Allow me to make another stab at guessing your type of personality- You think that the Immoral wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are justified, An opinion you happen to share with that war monger Bush. Go on tell me I'm wrong. To me your posts typify crass Middle Class false values, that in the final analysis should be surgically removed in order that Civilised Society can move forward to a further progressive level- a position that reactionaries like yourself , do everything in their power to intellectually evade and physically resist. Why do you ask if Communists qualify as a race?
other than inferring that you would transfer your racist opinions to include something that you adequately appear to have no true understanding of. The Capitalist propaganda machine, drastically reduced its output at least when it came to preaching to the already converted. However there is hope for everyone including the likes of you - who at the end of the day cant have a reasonable conversation without reducing it to a mere type of street squabbling.


Read and understand. Its all in the maths, moslem people are having more children. White european birth rate is falling. Its not racism, it's maths. Why would anyone willingly come to America...cause it's better than living in a council house on the buroo. Are you aware of Britain's colonial past? Scotland's colonial past (did you know for example that Scotland had 2 (failed) colonies in the US? AN attempt to scottishify AMerica, no? )

Keep the blinkers on Comrade.
OOH did they knock down McCaigs folly.....
Sweltered
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 1895
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:33 am


Postby Sweltered » Wed Sep 20, 2006 11:30 am

general jack o'niell wrote:and never phones home


Funny thing about phone lines, they go both ways.
OOH did they knock down McCaigs folly.....
Sweltered
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 1895
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:33 am


Postby general jack o'niell » Wed Sep 20, 2006 11:43 am

:idea:
Last edited by general jack o'niell on Wed Oct 18, 2006 3:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
general jack o'niell
 


Postby Beachcomber » Wed Sep 20, 2006 12:11 pm

Sweltered wrote:Its all in the maths, moslem people are having more children. White european birth rate is falling. Its not racism, it's maths.


Erm.. many white Europeans are also Muslims.

Islam is a faith not a race.
User avatar
Beachcomber
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 1074
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 9:41 am
Location: Scotland


Postby general jack o'niell » Wed Sep 20, 2006 12:21 pm

8)
Last edited by general jack o'niell on Wed Oct 18, 2006 3:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
general jack o'niell
 


Postby dedalus » Wed Sep 20, 2006 12:40 pm

Sorry to hog the forum - but this brings me back to modern Democracy as well - surely a failed political idea - The Roman democracy was a bit more clever than ours as you had to be "sucessful" to vote ( I dont think women were allowed - but I'll find out) Our democracy allows everyone to vote - hence our collective national IQ is used ( mathematically 1/2 of the available I.Q.) hence we get idiots at the top - it aspires to mediocrity. Factor in the fact that poorer (less successful) people have more children (Fact) and are rewarded for doing so ( state benefits) and you have a coutry whose collective I.Q. is going down - we are in the process of reversing evolution.
So our society may be becoming Islamasized(sic) but its also becoming more stupid and we are throwing away ability. Poor outlook Huh?
dedalus
Happy Camper
Happy Camper
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 6:12 pm


Postby general jack o'niell » Wed Sep 20, 2006 12:52 pm

8)
Last edited by general jack o'niell on Wed Oct 18, 2006 3:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
general jack o'niell
 


Postby John S » Wed Sep 20, 2006 12:53 pm

dedalus wrote:Sorry to hog the forum - but this brings me back to modern Democracy as well - surely a failed political idea - The Roman democracy was a bit more clever than ours as you had to be "sucessful" to vote ( I dont think women were allowed - but I'll find out) Our democracy allows everyone to vote - hence our collective national IQ is used ( mathematically 1/2 of the available I.Q.) hence we get idiots at the top - it aspires to mediocrity. Factor in the fact that poorer (less successful) people have more children (Fact) and are rewarded for doing so ( state benefits) and you have a coutry whose collective I.Q. is going down - we are in the process of reversing evolution.
So our society may be becoming Islamasized(sic) but its also becoming more stupid and we are throwing away ability. Poor outlook Huh?


So why does the national IQ increased by 3 points every decade? There is a significant body of evidence to show that social factors have a greater influence on intelligence than genetic make up.
John S
Can't Stay Away
Can't Stay Away
 
Posts: 706
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 8:02 pm
Location: Campbeltown


Postby general jack o'niell » Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:00 pm

deleted due to apathy on my part
Last edited by general jack o'niell on Wed Oct 18, 2006 3:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
general jack o'niell
 


Postby dedalus » Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:05 pm

John,

Yes more people are being educated - I.Q. is actually a poor test - women allways score worse than they should cos it has no test for tact empathy or doing 3 things at once ( all hugely valuably abilities) -But we have no other system other than what I loosly call "success". This could as suggested by our Dutch friend Christian mean contributing 120% of the national average tax burden for example -( immigrants have to achieve this or they get chucked out). Someone with a degree in social science may have a high I.Q. but they are still " useless" and probably shouldnt be allowed to vote.
dedalus
Happy Camper
Happy Camper
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 6:12 pm


Postby general jack o'niell » Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:19 pm

deleted due to apathy on my part
Last edited by general jack o'niell on Wed Oct 18, 2006 3:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
general jack o'niell
 


Postby John S » Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:20 pm

dedalus wrote:John,

Yes more people are being educated - I.Q. is actually a poor test - women allways score worse than they should cos it has no test for tact empathy or doing 3 things at once ( all hugely valuably abilities) -But we have no other system other than what I loosly call "success". This could as suggested by our Dutch friend Christian mean contributing 120% of the national average tax burden for example -( immigrants have to achieve this or they get chucked out). Someone with a degree in social science may have a high I.Q. but they are still " useless" and probably shouldnt be allowed to vote.


Success is a matter of opinion, are you going to base eligibility to vote on opinion? Whose opinion? Success at what? Would footballers get a vote?
John S
Can't Stay Away
Can't Stay Away
 
Posts: 706
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 8:02 pm
Location: Campbeltown


Postby general jack o'niell » Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:36 pm

:idea:
Last edited by general jack o'niell on Wed Oct 18, 2006 3:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
general jack o'niell
 


PreviousNext

Return to Local News and Issues

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests