Well there you go ,Iraq asks a room full of journos to witness two hangings to show the world they have got it right and there would not be a repeat of the previous fiasco.This time it would be done in a proper and professional manner.The condemned men chose to wear hoods over their heads and they got to wear orange boiler suits.First man fell through trap door,job done.Second fell,everything looking a-ok,but alas no,someone messed up.For as the rope pulled tight around the neck of the second condemned man as he reached the end of the rope,his body continued to fall to the ground.There was silence in the crowd of the spectators who were invited.Utter disbelief in what had just been witnessed.The head had just been ripped off the body.
Now the Iraqis ushered the press to a "green zone" where it was stated that it was not their fault."The rope never broke" EH,WHAT THE ....
Whoever took the measurements of these these men (height weight etc) and then calculated the length of rope and drop required to break the neck,made a bit of a mess

Whether it was intentional or not who knows. I think it was wrong.These hangings are the countries sentence for the crimes that they were found guilty of.They were sentenced in a court of law of that country(rightly or wrongly).That sentence should have been carried out in a professional manner,and not like a common lynching.Is it right that their sentences were carried out like they have done to others?