bill wrote:As England has approx. 10 times the population, and no doubt buys 10 times the amount of tickets than Scotland, then why should they not receive 10 times the allocation of lottery funding?
I think that is a good idea bill.. i look forward to 222m being spent in Scotland just to cover our fair share of lottery coffers, in proportion with the 2.2bn allocated to the Olympic funds.. No doubt we will get a wee bonus of at least another 100m when the Olympics are awarded a further 1bn.
But i have to point out that the 2.2bn is in fact being spend in LONDON alone. Its not being allocated to England's causes, thus is it not fair that the rest of the country get their fair share as well.
Thus if a city with a pop of 8m gets 2.2bn, then there needs to be 11.5bn allocated to the rest of England alone. Surely this should mean that Scotland's true allocation should be 1.4bn, just to make the dishing out of funds proportional.
All these calculations are not based on the true proportional spending on lottery products, but on your suggestion that England spends 10 times more than spent in Scotland.
We better be fair and give Wales its 825m and N. Ireland its 470m.
So, bill if you want spending to be proportional, then lets do it right by breaking it right down. That way everyone gets the funds that are being raised in their own direct area.
That makes a total of 16bn just to be proportional with the Olympics/London's 2.2bn... for your next trick. Can you explain to me where the lottery are going to get the funds to make this proportional??