Missing Toddler in Portugal

This forum provides an opportunity for people to debate and discuss the latest current events; to talk about what's going on in the world today and discuss what's behind the news headlines.

Postby Beachcomber » Wed May 30, 2007 6:14 pm

From what I read she didn't see the child's face so it *could* just have been his own child. It was only after they realised she was missing that she put two and two together. The same article said she told the Portugese Police straight away but they didn't seem to think it important and that only when the UK Police got involved did they seem to do anything with it.
User avatar
Beachcomber
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 1074
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 9:41 am
Location: Scotland


Postby Sweltered » Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:03 pm

I thought the family were taking time to grieve...Now they are gadding about Morocco.

I hate to say it, but where are the other kids? Who is looking after them? Or are they being trailed around Europe.

There's something not right about all this..Mark my words.
OOH did they knock down McCaigs folly.....
Sweltered
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 1895
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:33 am


Postby Beachcomber » Tue Jun 12, 2007 2:23 pm

As is usually reported in the press or news, the other kids are being looked after by family members who have gone out to join them, and I'd hardly describe searching for your missing child as 'gadding about'.
User avatar
Beachcomber
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 1074
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 9:41 am
Location: Scotland


Postby Bobbie En Tejas » Tue Jun 12, 2007 6:30 pm

I'm thinking the same as sweltered, that there is something not quite right about this. The only thing missing is the "bushy-haired stranger."
Some people die at 21 but aren't buried until they are 65.
User avatar
Bobbie En Tejas
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 3535
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:55 am
Location: Southwest of Campbeltown


Postby Sweltered » Tue Jun 12, 2007 11:18 pm

Beachcomber wrote:As is usually reported in the press or news, the other kids are being looked after by family members who have gone out to join them, and I'd hardly describe searching for your missing child as 'gadding about'.


Just seems that going off and leaving their children is somewhat of a trait with these people..
OOH did they knock down McCaigs folly.....
Sweltered
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 1895
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:33 am


Postby Beachcomber » Wed Jun 13, 2007 8:57 am

Sweltered wrote:
Beachcomber wrote:As is usually reported in the press or news, the other kids are being looked after by family members who have gone out to join them, and I'd hardly describe searching for your missing child as 'gadding about'.


Just seems that going off and leaving their children is somewhat of a trait with these people..


Maybe but would you rather they dragged them all over the continent instead of leaving them safe amongst family members that they know and are comfortable with?

The problem with the EUs open borders policy is that the little girl could be virtually anywhere by now.
User avatar
Beachcomber
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 1074
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 9:41 am
Location: Scotland


Postby Sweltered » Wed Jun 13, 2007 11:09 am

Beachcomber wrote:
Sweltered wrote:
Beachcomber wrote:As is usually reported in the press or news, the other kids are being looked after by family members who have gone out to join them, and I'd hardly describe searching for your missing child as 'gadding about'.


Just seems that going off and leaving their children is somewhat of a trait with these people..


Maybe but would you rather they dragged them all over the continent instead of leaving them safe amongst family members that they know and are comfortable with?

The problem with the EUs open borders policy is that the little girl could be virtually anywhere by now.


Exactly and that's why it should be left to the police/interpol, whoever. Perception is reality, it doesn't matter what they are doing, it looks like they are traipsing about Europe, without their kids. The news reporting is not now about the abduction or the investigation, it is about their travels publicizing the abduction. What about the other missing kids? Where's the fund for their parents to search for them? Where's the worldwide media blitz for them?

They should be attending to their children. If they had exerted a 1000th of the effort they input into publicizing the abduction, into being responsible parents, she would never have been abducted in the first place.
OOH did they knock down McCaigs folly.....
Sweltered
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 1895
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:33 am


Postby Malky » Wed Jun 13, 2007 11:51 am

Sweltered wrote:If they had exerted a 1000th of the effort they input into publicizing the abduction, into being responsible parents, she would never have been abducted in the first place.

What a crock of shit you are talking

Malky
User avatar
Malky
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 1762
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:08 pm


Postby Sweltered » Wed Jun 13, 2007 12:07 pm

So you think it's perfectly acceptible to leave three kids unattended and go off to a bar? What else do you think is appropriate? I shudder to think. They were toddlers, not teenagers.

There were six or seven kids killed in a fire yesterday, they'd been playing with matches, and had been left unattended. I suppose it's ok according to you, for the kids to be playing with the matches, just unfortunate that they were killed in the fire.

Give me a break..
OOH did they knock down McCaigs folly.....
Sweltered
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 1895
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:33 am


Postby Malky » Wed Jun 13, 2007 1:41 pm

I was commenting on your "1000th of the effort" statement which is such a sweeping statement as to be a "crock of shit". These parents made a mistake and have been punished for it in such a horrible way.

Oh and the matches thing is another sweeping statement that is not worthy of a reply. You don't deserve a break.

Malky
User avatar
Malky
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 1762
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:08 pm


Postby general jack o'niell » Wed Jun 13, 2007 2:30 pm

not for the first time i'm agreeing with sweltered, maybe its our upbringing, but i've said all along i don't like the look or the sound of the father, even the way he pronounces his daughters name grates on me whenever i hear it.

the facts of the matter are, they left three "small" children alone to have a boozy dinner, we only have their word for it that they were checking them every half an hour, they probably only checked once and that was when they discovered her missing, then a small white lie to the police, which even if it had happened here would mean a delay and a wrong timescale, in portugal i'd bet its fatal. i'm afraid i think she has been dead for weeks, it takes a extremely wicked person to take a child in the first place, they'd have no problems killing her and dumping the body when all the publicity exploded. since the authorities now think it had been planned, then the plan would have a get out strategy, i think she'll never be found, if the parents want to live the rest of their lives believing that she is alive and being taken good care of by her abductors then may that bring them some peace, but the bottom line is they neglected their children, one of them was abducted and as far as we know is probably dead, when are they going to be charged with something, my anger at their blatent disregard for the safety of the three kids far outweighs my pity for them, now they are traipsing about with this tour of europe, the morocco visit was like a royal tour with the kids holding up pics of a girl they knew nothing about, plus theres a good chance that several of those kids will die within the next couple of years from something or other. where next? malawi, darfur, a palestinian camp somewhere, or maybe a market in baghdad.

none of it takes away from the facts, what they did was criminal, i'm not saying it serves them right, never, but i get the feeling their the kind of parents that see kids as an accessory to their lives, like a new handbag or a puppy, just as long as you don't expect me to look after them.
general jack o'niell
 


Postby Sweltered » Wed Jun 13, 2007 3:47 pm

Malky wrote:I was commenting on your "1000th of the effort" statement which is such a sweeping statement as to be a "crock of mince". These parents made a mistake and have been punished for it in such a horrible way.

Oh and the matches thing is another sweeping statement that is not worthy of a reply. You don't deserve a break.

Malky


Of course you can't reply, because there is no argument in favor of this. And neither are sweeping statements. It would not have taken much effort to look after their kids. STAY AT HOME INSTEAD OF GOING TO THE PUB.
A no-brainer.
OOH did they knock down McCaigs folly.....
Sweltered
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 1895
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:33 am


Postby Beachcomber » Wed Jun 13, 2007 7:12 pm

Ye gods, sanctimonious barely covers it.
User avatar
Beachcomber
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 1074
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 9:41 am
Location: Scotland


Postby Bobbie En Tejas » Wed Jun 13, 2007 7:20 pm

The question isn't to stay home 100% of the time with no social life or be considered a bad parent. It is to make sure you have good care by people you can trust with your kids while you're gone and not leave them alone.
Some people die at 21 but aren't buried until they are 65.
User avatar
Bobbie En Tejas
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 3535
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:55 am
Location: Southwest of Campbeltown


Postby Malky » Wed Jun 13, 2007 8:06 pm

Beachcomber wrote:Ye gods, sanctimonious barely covers it.

:)

Malky
User avatar
Malky
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 1762
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:08 pm


PreviousNext

Return to Current Affairs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests