Here is another judgement Adolf Hitler was a baddie


Beachcomber wrote:That isn't making a moral judgement. To do so requires actual knowledge of the person; you're just name-calling, or do you perhaps feel that every woman who commits adultery deserves that title?





Beachcomber wrote:I focussed on women because it was a woman you called a 'whore'.
So in your opinion anyone that commits adultery is a 'whore' ? Interesting.

Bobbie En Tejas wrote:I'm disturbed by your post, ionns, on a few levels. But just to point out, if someone really "had no problem" with someone else's private life, I doubt they'd even think to call them a whore.
Also, you use an interesting combination of words: adultery, whore, idolatry, worship, saintly. Are you really a catholic priest disguised as an atheist?

ionnsaigh wrote:Beachcomber wrote:So in your opinion anyone that commits adultery is a 'whore' ? Interesting.
What do you mean interesting ? - in what respect do you find it interesting.
ionnsaigh wrote:With the greatest respect Beachcomber- you have yet to voice an opinion of Diana - yet you expect to put your twopence worth in - without contributing to the core subject matter- do you think Diana was murdered on the orders of the Royal Family?.






Annie wrote:Well, if you think about it, if Diana had any more children with Dodi, the child would be the half brother or sister to the heirs apparent. Thus if tragedy occurs, that child may lay claim to the throne! Other than Charles having more kids with the horse-woman, Camilla, then I don't see him having another clear blood line!
Any thoughts?




Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests