The Sheridans

by **EMDEE** » Sun Feb 24, 2008 3:02 am

News tonight, Mrs Sheridan is saying the family are the victims of police harassment.

Any comment.

Ionnsaigh?

by **Sweltered** » Sun Feb 24, 2008 3:18 am

There does seem to be an impression of vindictiveness by the police

by **EMDEE** » Sun Feb 24, 2008 3:49 am

But who is pulling the strings?

by **general jack o'niell** » Sun Feb 24, 2008 5:43 am

gerry anderson?

by **4th gen Suthen'** » Sun Feb 24, 2008 7:39 am

Gepetto?

by **general jack o'niell** » Sun Feb 24, 2008 7:42 am

insomnia?

by **general jack o'niell** » Sun Feb 24, 2008 7:44 am

the sheridans, scotland in minituares

by **ionnsaigh** » Sun Feb 24, 2008 8:10 am

EMDEE wrote:News tonight, Mrs Sheridan is saying the family are the victims of police harassment.

Any comment.

Ionnsaigh?

Very difficult for myself to remain objective, when it comes to Tommy and gang. I can't stand any of them.
However I can't stand the Murdoch empire either - so I have a chip on both shoulders.
Are they innocent victims, no they are as guilty as hell. Are they the victims of police harassment, absolutely yes.

by **ionnsaigh** » Mon Feb 25, 2008 12:08 pm

A crime or crimes have been allegedly committed. The police have a duty to investigate and produce evidence.
The miniature bottles of booze I suspect are common articles - found in the cupboards of most BA employees - including the top rank of management.
The police searched the Sheridan home in connection with the perjury allegation. Did they find any discriminating evidence? or did they have a - " we will get them for something mentality " ?
It certainly seems that way. If the police found drugs in the house - then they would be bound to charge - regardless of alleged perjury.
However wee bottles of booze are not illegal substances. As far as I'm aware these can be bought by BA cabin crew.75 Pence. So the police who are there to investigate perjury - take it upon themselves - to contact her Employers regarding perfectly face value - legitimate items.
That is police harassment.

by **general jack o'niell** » Tue Feb 26, 2008 12:09 am

its enough to sway folk who have no time for them in their favour, and makes the police look very small, how vindictive do you have to be to have even had it go thru your head on seeing the bottles that they must be stolen from BA and then inform them, i saw that some had asda stickers on them, did they just ignore that little piece of detail? scottish police force is a joke, i know from personal experience, my son was assaulted and it was reported, nothing was done, but if i'd gone and done what i wanted to do at the time i would no doubt have been charged with the full force of the law and dragged thru the court, i had to settle for coming face to face with the culprit in a queue in tesco and seeing him nearly fill his breeks when he twigged who i was (the hat is a dead give away)

by **bill** » Tue Feb 26, 2008 2:37 pm

general jack o'niell wrote:coming face to face with the culprit in a queue in tesco and seeing him nearly fill his breeks when he twigged who i was (the hat is a dead give away)

So is the slippers :lol: