Malky wrote:OMG. Surely to goodness the people involved in OK would have been able to put these corporate guests minds to rest over what they were getting involved in. To pin the blame on a couple of posters on this forum is a bit far fetched. If that's all it takes to put these corporate guests off then perhaps they weren't as committed to the ideas of OK and Sirolli as they should have been. Surely OK doesn't need fair weather friends.
Malky
Malky
Firstly, you could quite easily be a fair-weather supporter of OK or even just like eating, drinking and dancing to want to attend the Ball in Campbeltown. Attendance or non-attendance cannot be used as a measure of implied support for the project.
I heard from a reasonable source that the tickets were pointedly handed back on Saturday morning and a refund requested. Somebody must have felt strongly enough to go to that bother and then to tell their guests at very short notice that just like Cinders, they would not be going to the Ball.
I think it would be a mistake to underestimate the power of this forum for the rapid spreading of misinformation on the street . Unpalatable as it might seem , I think it is quite conceivable that certain people might withdraw support from an event if faced with this type of speculation. I would certainly wonder myself if I had just shelled out £250 to support a local organisation only to be told that the money might be heading elsewhere less desirable.
My guess is that the tickets would be returned to an individual, who would be quite shell-shocked at the scenario whilst trying to deal with last minute preparations and in the circumstances would struggle to provide a convincing defence about anything!
Doesn't look too far fetched from where I'm standing?






