Govangirl wrote:Ionns, it is a shame you have had to aplogise. Your original poem, in context was indeed intended to show the ugliness of racist language. (I disagree entirely with your use of 'pigs' though........) One sure thing we know about you is that you haven't a racist bone in your body.
I disagree Govangirl. It wasnt a shame he had to apologise although he was very gracious in doing so.
I refer you back to my post on page 3, the poem was completely out of order and for me had crossed the line, no matter in what context, you cannot justify it. Perhaps its because contrary to what you believe Ionns, those actual words do actually affect me personally and its something ive had to deal with all my life, so you can say my opinion is slightly different from your "former slum dwelling etc" stance. Im not having a go at you Ionns, just giving you an idea where im coming from, and again, i appreciate your posts afterwards.
But again as I stated on my post in the previous page Govangirl, its always easy to take an objective stance on things when such hurtful comments dont affect you. You can discuss it all you like, but you dont have a personal history with those comments.
I feel like im repeating myself here, but i like to make my position clear. I dont mind discussion on such subjects, in fact i would encourage them. My problem was with the poem itself regardless of its reason, it had crossed the line for me. Maybe it didnt for you or anyone else on here who can justify its existence, but then again, your not any one of those so called "ethnics" are you? There are far better ways of bringing the subject to the fore, as a teacher i thought you might have understood that. In fact the comments you have made have proven my point on bringing the subject to the fore in a responsible way.