hugh wrote:Mortality rates? Maybe you have to look closer to home to explain them. This may be controversial, but here goes; Maybe the lifestyle in the West of Scotland has something to with that? Drink, drugs, junk food etc. ... lifestyle's a personal choice in this country. Many in Africa don't have the luxury of choice.
One has no choice of where your born, or who your parents may be - I think I can safely say that without fear of contradiction.
However when a baby is born, it inherits both the characteristics of it's parents, and the particular culture attributed to them. If that culture reinforces negative lifestyle choices - then the concept of free will is negated or obsolete. What choice do babies have ? as choice infers both knowledge and means. If going on a cruise is about personal lifestyle choices then one has to have the means to make that choice - the pounds shillings and pence. Otherwise those who don't have the means, have little in the way of choice. Drink drugs and junk food are not the exclusive sins of the poor - those classes above the social strata indulge also. So that doesn't explain the higher mortality rate now, does it? Poor slum housing and chronic ill health are contributing factors in the morally unacceptable levels of disease and death, within the working class population of Scotland.
Social exclusion by it's insidious nature, hampers or prevents informed choice, as much as lack of funds.
hugh wrote:Kilter. As in ' Your perceived knowledge is out of kilter with reality ', which it certainly is if you think the situation of "the poor" in Scotland stands any comparison with that of the poor in Africa. Like going to hospital with a cut finger and demanding to be treated before haemorrhaging road accident victims. Just sometimes comes across as more of a self-pitying whine than a political philosophy?
Sorry I stand corrected, Kilter it is - however I hope my meaning wasn't distorted too much by this one word. I like to think that in terms of communicating, grammar takes second place to meaning.
You miss the point I was making hugh - my concern was that the meaning of poverty becomes distorted when you see those awful sights of babies dying ( lifestyle choice) ? For the sake of argument lets forget Scotland for a minute, What of the babies turned away from feeding stations because they may be a gram over the limit - these are also my concern - for they are tomorrows TV show. Back to Scotland and the cut finger brigade - nobody suggested that a cut finger, should be taken before a hemorrhage - what frightens me is the lack of any reference to that cut finger, or that the cut is self inflicted. We both know that prevention is better than cure - yet in this land Scotland, we have an open wound that will grow septic if not treated.
Get it up yer kilter
