Prince Charles and architecture

[EMDEE]

Prince Charles has been criticised by a leading architect for becoming involved in the plans for Chelsea Barracks:

http://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/Article.aspx/1261337

Not only this, but Lord Hattersley has also commented as follows:

"His interference in the Chelsea Barracks decision exemplifies all that is most unacceptable about a hereditary monarchy. As a result of blood and birth, a middle-aged man of no particular merit enjoys a special status in society."

Is this really an acceptable way to speak about our much respected and beloved heir to the throne?

[Bobbie En Tejas]

I tend to agree with Prince Charles' opinion of much modern-day "architecture" - it is boxed, characterless and ugly.

[Pete Reek]

I tend to agree with Prince Charles' opinion of much modern-day "architecture" - it is boxed, characterless and ugly.

As is Prince Charles.

[hugh]

Is this really an acceptable way to speak about our much respected and beloved heir to the throne?

Yes.

[EMDEE]

Is this really an acceptable way to speak about our much respected and beloved heir to the throne?

Yes.

I thought it might be.