by their stupid rules which get me sick inside
They've been made by men who've given up the search,
whose gods are dead..."
As somebody once said.
I can only vaguely remember posting about Gary McKinnon on here.
Anyways, Gary McKInnon. He breaches their security. Now I know that's wrong, but...if someone considers cyberspace to be their own sacrosanct and unbreachable territory then surely it's up to them to arrange their own cyber affairs a little better?
By all accounts it was a shambolic attempt at security by the supposedly most security conscious nation in the world, and the whole thing stinks of embarrassed scapegoat finding. Now I could see the point in treating this man as an international criminal if he were seeking to use any knowledge gained for evil ends, but he so obviously wasn't. As for 700,000 dollars (or whatever they claim it was) of damage, I'd love to see an itemised bill for that. How do they work that out? Does that include costs and labour? Or is that just the price of a bolt on the stable door after the horse has gone?
Also...if the law says the "crime" was committed in the United States, then the law is bent in favour of the powerful. Wouldn't be the first time. I really think this one of the most ridiculous and vindictive aspects of the whole affair, and if a Home Secretary has no opinion to offer on that then he's in the wrong job. As for Asperger's syndrome, I don't even think that should come into it. Aspies for freedom, I say, and free Gary McKinnon.
Sorry for rambling on so much, I'm in much the same condition as I was when I first posted.




