by big tony » Fri Jul 27, 2007 2:40 pm
how very childish of you malky, to ban two members without contacting them, then tell them they should contact the webmaster or board admin but deny access to do so.
as for the snide remarks, i know for a fact that they are two of the more open and transparent posters who's true identities are known to all, that can't even be said for you, GJO for one would be delighted to debate his ban with you, on the forum, on the phone or even face to face, he has nothing to hide, he hasn't got a website selling sex toys for example like one of his brothers detractors.
its a sad day when one person, contradicts themself after claiming no one was bigger than the forum and bans two high profile members without justification, just because, and i'm assuming this to be your reason? your wee feelings were hurt. grow up, if your the man you claim to be start acting like one, none of this "its my BAA and i'm going home" what do you intend to do when you get there? tell your mammy? send her roon to thon big bad shaw boys hoose in limecraigs? i'm sure he'd love that!!!!
i have it on good authority that all his recent posts have been vetted by his wife, so if she grudgingly approves them, who are you to spit the dummy? or was it your rattle you dropped? because theres a helluva empty vessel noise about your "your both banned" post, i suspect a good deal of jealousy on your part, you only wish you had half the brains, wit, humour and knowledge that morris and allan shaw possess.
thats right, for anyone that doesn't know already, and just in case wee malky forgets to move this to a wee sheep pen for further investigation, thats who general jack o'niell and sweltered are, morris shaw and allan shaw, are you going to ban their other two brothers and their sister too, just for being related, if so have a wee look at dunoons last post, he's been holding this forum up as how a forum should work to the web industry across the world in his position with scottish enterprise, so clever move banning his brothers because you don't like their opinions, they've said it often enough, what they post is accurate and true to the best of their knowledge purely and simply because their names are known and therefor anything they write is directly attributable to them, they don't hide behind screen names and fake identities.
nobody ever said you had to agree with everything anyone said, it would be a sad world if we did, so be a man, give him a real explanation, his number is in the book, under SHAW M.
limecraigs, i for one want to be party to that conversation, who knows, i might well be?